Archiving and eDiscovery Ideas

Show:

idea RSS

Products:

Topics

We have found the criical need to be able to run overlays to populate custom fields with information after a load has been conducted. All information is not always available at the time of injestion. Right now without the overlay feature one would have to reload the data with an updated loadfile. Hence having to load data more than once. This would be very useful. Thanks

Suggested: 14 Mar 2013 by hgcarroll | 1 comment - last comment 16 Apr 2013 by Stroupie

When scanning hardcopy documents into electronic format, it is common to code the folder name as part of the document name. That is, the first document in a folder titled "Invoices" might become "Invoices_doc001.pdf". When later reviewing those documents, it is often most helpful to review them in the order as they existed in the file. Since these are scans of hardcopy documents, we can not rely on the metadata common to electronic documents so ...

Suggested: 20 Feb 2013 by Mike Rossander

I work for local government and we process a large number of Public Disclosure Requests. Currently we log each redaction and list the associated code. As we begin to use (Clearwell) e-Discovery, we will code the redaction and supply the requester with a key. We believe it would be more efficient to pre-populate these codes so the person doing the redaction would simply have to pick the proper code from a drop down list. This would eliminate entering the code ...

Suggested: 26 Mar 2013 by WayneOppie

With the introduction of seperate tagging for parents and children in 7.1.2 it has oepened up a more customisable review process. However with implementing this feature clients are finding it frustrating having to apply tags twice once for parents once for attachments while reviewing in 'Review Mode'. It would be beneficial to have an "apply tag to children check box" when tagging a parent. I realise this feature is avaliable in snippet mode however Reviewers spend 99% of ...

Suggested: 13 Mar 2013 by MarkAnderson | 4 comments - last comment 18 Apr 2013 by tinak

Area: Outlook add-in Have the Outlook Add-in dynamically change allowed buttons depending on policy settings, mailbox/folder clicked on etc. Right now you might have store in vault, restore from vault and so on, on your primary mailbox, but a secondary mailbox you may only have the ability to read (and search) for information.. so, when you select that additional mailbox the buttons which are visible in the ribbon/toolbar should change to reflect that.

Suggested: 23 May 2013 by MichelZ

The ‘Allow users to delete from archives’ option should be set-able on the desktop policy. Of course you would need to consider what can be done with FSA archives, which aren’t part of a ‘user policy’.. but .. simply at the site level is restrictive.

Suggested: 23 May 2013 by MichelZ

We would like to request that the option to inherit properties from a top-level department to sub department be included in a future release. E.g. We would like to be able to set 0% monitoring of Internal Exchange on the top-level deparement and have that flow to sub-departments. Currently, we run a script in SQL to change these values after a department is created.

Suggested: 22 May 2013 by jakeg21

We would like to see an enhancement to Compliance Accelerator where the monitored employee that caused the email to show up in a review set is highlighted. This would make it easier for a reviewer to determine the monitored employee that triggered the email to be in the review set when an email has a message with an expanded DL of 100s of employees. They would like this for random sampling but especially would like it for hotword searches as well.

Suggested: 22 May 2013 by jakeg21

Request from our Compliance Accelerator user base the ability to: 1) customize the reports view that are visible when they create new reports. Currently all available reports are visible and available. They are requesting the ability to only see the reports that they run regularly, in their view 2) Ability to create report subscriptions so that reports are emailed regularly, rather than have to create a weekly report.

Suggested: 21 May 2013 by VictorK

Hello, My organisation has a specific requirement to incrementally control the size of EVSVR Repair and Verify DatabaseReferences and DatabaseLinkages operations. This is because we are already defining our scans down to the Vault Store Partition level and still the scans take months to complete. Storage and Database access has been sped up substantially, but we simply cant get the scan running fast enough. The scans will never complete as the servers or EVSVR crash before the ...

Suggested: 19 May 2013 by SeanDonovan | 5 comments - last comment 23 May 2013 by Rob.Wilcox

Show Listings per page

Archiving and eDiscovery Ideas

Links